Reality TV - Online 24/7: Day 148
in the loft... 
CHOK
AM 1070 Radio Sarnia, Ontario 
CKNW AM 980
Radio Vancouver, BC. 
CBC Radio, Regina, SK. The Leger Marketing
survey found 52.9 per cent of respondents backed capital punishment,
while 43 per cent opposed
it and 4.1 per cent had no opinion.
"Canadians' perceptions of
the death penalty have changed in
the last few years," said
Jean-Marc Leger, head of the polling firm.
The survey suggested a
big opinion shift since 1995, when an
Angus Reid poll found 69
per cent in favour of bringing back capital punishment,
he added.
The death penalty was
banned in Canada in 1975. The last
state-run executions were
in 1962. Since then, the stiffest penalty for
even the worst crimes has
been life imprisonment.
The latest poll has a
national margin of error of 2.6 percentage
points, 19 times out of
20. It used a sample of 1,508 people telephoned by
pollsters between Aug. 3
and 13.
That was well before
the Sept.
11 events in the United States
when hijacked planes hit
New York's World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a
field near Pittsburgh,
causing death on an unbelievable scale.
But Mr. Leger said
grisly crimes, whether committed by groups or
individuals, don't appear
to have any permanent effect on
Canadians' viewpoints
about the death penalty.
"I don't think [the
death penalty] is an overriding issue,"
said Randy White, Canadian
Alliance MP for the British Columbia riding of
Langley-Abbotsford. "It's
not on the minds of many people."
Mr. White, who is
opposition critic for the Solicitor-General's
department, said he is not
convinced that bringing back the death penalty
in Canada would prevent
murders because people committing violent crimes do
not stop to ponder the
consequences.
A free parliamentary
vote held in 1987, when Brian Mulroney was
prime minister, went
against restoring capital punishment.
But the Canadian
Association of Chiefs of Police says it hasn't
changed its view that the
death penalty should be an option.
It says the noose could
be limited to crimes that are "so
terrible, so abominable,
so outrageous to public sensitivity."
Tracy Lamourie,
co-ordinator of the Canadian Coalition Against
the death penalty, sees
growing doubts about capital punishment in the
wake of wrongful
convictions and fabricated evidence.
"It really comes down
to the
lawyer you get and who can tell a
better story in court.
People are just generally less sure of the death penalty
and the way that it's
applied."
WICHITA, Kan. — Some crime victims say they
are appalled that prison inmates have access
to Web sites that allow them to place personal advertisements
promoting themselves as lonely hearts.
For example, convicted killer Sakone Donesay sent an ad to
Prisonpenpals.org that says he's looking for companionship and to, in
his
words, "maybe collide with someone whom would not mind sharing intellect
and intimate conversation."
The site and others like it -- including Jailbabes.com,
Ladiesofthepen.com
and Meet-an-inmate.com -- disgust the father of Donesay's victim.
"Does it say anywhere on there that he is a cop killer?" said Rick
Easter.
Donesay, then 14, shot and killed Easter's son Kevin, a Sedgwick County
sheriff's deputy, during a foot chase in 1996. "He's a hardened
criminal.
That's the kind of thing he could easily use to take advantage of
someone."
Someone who sees the smiling face of the person who harmed them or a
family member is victimized again, said Corinne Radke, a victims
advocate
with Parents of Murdered Children in Wichita.
Reading about what sensitive, caring people they claim to be is even worse.
"Most of them are lying," she said.
But operators defend the sites, saying they help prisoners maintain a
connection to the community.
"In most cases, the prisoners are just looking for a good friend," said
Tracie
Lamourie, director of the Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty,
which operates a free Web site that allows prisoners to meet pen pals
and
display their poetry and writings. "Strong relationships have been
built, and
that's important."
Prison officials, who starting receiving complaints about the sites
about three
years ago, say there is not much that can be done about them.
Kansas Corrections spokesman Bill Miskell said some people concerned
about the sites are under the misconception that the prisoners have
access
to the Internet.
"They do not," Miskell said. "But we can't stop them from sending mail
to
friends or family and having them contact the Internet company. We
can't stop
them from receiving mail they get in response, either."
Prison officials are allowed to monitor mail only for specific reasons,
such
as
escape plans or plotting a crime.
Miskell advises caution. He said although there are inmates looking
only for
a connection with the community, others are looking to manipulate
someone.
For example, prisoners tell pen pals they're getting out of jail next
month and
need money for a bus ticket, he said.
The pen pal might send $100, which the prisoner, who isn't getting out
anytime soon, will deposit in an account used to buy items from the
prison
commissary, Miskell said.
"People need to be careful," he said. "That's the best defense."
ENGLISH TRANSLATION : FROM Der
Spiegel
D E A T H R O W O N L I N E
The Voice of the Condemned
By Tobias Moorstedt
In the USA more than 3500 People are sitting in the
death row, many of them after
questioning processes. The internet gives them
the possibility to communicate with the
outside.
John McDewberry doesn´t have much time left
and he
has a lot to say. For seven years
the now 24 year-old sits in the deathrow of the little
village Livingston in Texas and his
last chance drifts away to escape the death on the
order of state. For an
appeal-process however the young Texan lacks
money. Because of this he calls on the
world-publicity in the internet: "This is a cry for
help!" McDewberry writes on his website.
And: "I am innocent, but can´t afford a lawyer."
Like John McDewberry some hundred inmates of the
deathrows in the USA have a
website. In the Internet the inmates show their
views - here they are looking for contacts
to the outside, ask for funds or to bomb the
responsible district attorney with
protest-mails.
Life in the deat-cell writes John McDewberry, is a
life in silence. The internet is a gate to
the outside world for the prisoners. Unlikely the
zero-medium tv, the internet not only
offers pictures and information; one can also be in
action with the great wide world. A
bit at least. The internet is the voice of the
condmned. Somehow.
Because of this John McDewberry writes for his
life. Tells, how everything happened, at
that time, at christmas eve in the year 1994. How
he started the day with a real
hangover and how he than, five hours later, with
swollen face was standing at the
house-wall, in his back six policemen, who first hit
befor asking question. However
evidences for his sights of view he rarely has.
He just has the many lines and both
pictures on his website.
Since the Supreme Court reinstated capital
punishment in
1976, the USA executed
more than 700 people. 84 last year alone.
Executions became daily routine in
America.
But it´s just a few weeks ago that the world
has been watching a building in Terre Haute,
Oklahoma, where the live of Timothy McVeigh was coming
to an end. Never before it
has been so much rumour about an execution.
Timothy McVeigh should die, who
bombed 168 persons to death four years ago. For
some days Timothy McVeigh was
standing in the middle again. And his words on
the front page of nearly every page: "I
am the lord of my faith, captain of my soul."
Not all inmates in american death-cells get so much
publicity like McVeigh. And
publicity is in a time, where trials ruled in the media
as well, often the only thing that
differs between a fast execution and a new taking up of
investigations.
For example the case of Anthony Graves. The
description of his case in the internet
persuaded the lawyer Robert E. Greenwood of his
innocence. The case was resumed.
New evidences came before court. Today Anthony
Graves has a good chance to leave
prison alive says his lawyer.
But Anthony Graves is a single case. Very
seldom the protest and the engagement of
human rights organisations make a difference at all.
And than there are stories in the internet like the
one of Olga Parlante, who was found
with cut throat on the bottom of her living room in
1997. Her son hat made a virtual burial
place in the internet with stars, angels and a lot of
crosses. The virtual grave of Olga
Parlante is just one of more than 1800 on the
cyber-cemetry for murder-victims, the
texan Charleene hall has made up. "In the
Internet, there are only websites against the
death penalty", Hall writes on her homepage. "But
what about the murder victims?"
Hall wants to give the dead a voice and she is sure:
If the dead could talk, the would
scream for revenge. She doesn´t understand
people, who are fighting against the death
penalty. "They should inform themselves better,
before the feel so sorry about these
murderers."
"As long as prisoners are waiting for death",
Tracy Lamourie would than probably reply,
"we have to give them a voice. Even if they
lie." Lamourie is the chair of the Canadian
Coalition Against the Death Penalty (CCADP) and
every week letters by people on
death row reach her; poems and photos and "new
evidences". If it´s true than what´s on
the website, the reader has to value by himself.
After the execution of an inmate, tells Lamouie,
she takes the respective site out of the
net very soon. Because time doesn´t
stand still and more people are condemned to
death and the capacity of the server is
limited. "The internet is our best weapon" says
Lamourie. But: Many inmates are in their cells
for so long, they don´t know what the
internet is.
- Der
Spiegel online edition (in German)
www.wired.com
June 12, 2001 Wired
News They don't want to die. And they're begging you to save them.
Hundreds of death row inmates have turned to the
Internet in an effort to spare their lives.
They say they are innocent and plead with the Web
community to donate money to their legal defense,
send e-petitions to governors, and read their
versions of the facts. Through sites created by
relatives, friends and activists -- many of them not
in the United States -- they are able to appeal
directly to a world-wide audience.
"I reach out to you in a cry for help! I am indigent and cannot get the
legal help I so desperately need, which may cost me my life.... You
are my last hope, without you I am fighting a lost cause!"
Those are the words of 24-year-old John Dewberry, convicted of killing a
man on Christmas Day 1994 and giving away the victim's possessions
as presents to his friends.
But just as death row inmates turn to the Internet to beg for mercy,
the families of murder victims go online to demand justice. Both sides
state their case, ask for money, and petition signatures. Some look for
clues to solve murders that are 30 years old.
Not surprisingly, the two sides frequently collide.
Here's another:
"I sit on Death Row today waiting to be executed for a horrible crime
that
I did not commit, and unless I get some sort of attention drawn to my
case, the state of Texas is going to murder me," writes Anthony Graves,
convicted with another man of killing six people and burning their
bodies.
Graves publishes his version of the events on his website, as well as a
statements by his co-defendant that state Graves did not
participate in the crime.
His story was enough to compel attorney Roy E. Greenwood to
defend him, pro bono.
"I think he's innocent," said Greenwood, who says he's spent
$30,000 of his money on the case. "He's got a good chance of getting
his verdict overturned."
Then there's the case of Gary Graham. When Graham was 17, he
was convicted of gunning down a man in a Houston Safeway parking
lot. Despite an international clamor to overturn the verdict, he was
executed last year after spending almost 20 years on death row.
Graham stridently proclaimed his innocence until the moment he
received a lethal injection similar to the one that killed Timothy
McVeigh
on Monday. His last words remain as a haunting reminder on the Web:
"They are killing me tonight. They are murdering me tonight."
(McVeigh, incidentally, did not have an "official" website, and never
proclaimed his innocence. The domains "timothymcveigh.com" and
"timothymcveigh.net" are owned by a third party who is trying to sell
rights to the Web address.)
On Pro-Death Penalty.com is a point-by-point refutation of
Graham's claims.
The site is one of three run by victims advocate Charlene Hall. The
other two are Justice For All and MurderVictims.com, where Hall has
erected a virtual memorial to over 1,800 murder victims.
She started her Web efforts after a pair of teenage girls in her
hometown were raped and strangled by a gang of six boys; one of the
girls was the daughter of her close
friend. But when she searched the Internet for information on the
death penalty, all she found were anti-death penalty sites. So she
taught herself HTML and posted information in support of capital
punishment.
Hall says she has no patience for the entreaties of convicted killers.
"Their whole point is to delay (the execution)," Hall said. "Basically
they're trying to buy time. I just feel sorry for the people that get
taken
in by that and wish they'd do a little more research before feeling so
bad
for these people."
Hall gets her share of hate e-mail for her views; she stores the death
threats and insults in a folder marked "non-victims and nuts."
Murdervictims.com serves as a hub for the surviving members of
shattered families -- people often shunned by a society that can favor
pleasantries over honesty.
Sharon Meissner, whose 18-year-old son was hanged by an
acquaintance, is a frequent poster on the site's discussion board. There
she talks about that fateful morning she found Gregg's body, and
laments that his killer was only convicted of third-degree murder
and sentenced to 25 years in prison.
"Sometimes we feel like we don't fit in anyplace," said Meissner, of
Holly,
Minnesota. "People want us to forget about our son's death, to
move on. At the board, we can talk without offending anybody."
Meissner's posts also brought her help. Her case caught the
attention of an Internet-based criminal profiler, who is
volunteering to investigate a case she believes was mishandled by
the local police.
In a tribute to her son, Meissner describes her son's mischievous
personality as the disquieting melody of one of his favorite
songs is streamed: Metallica's Fade to Black.
"My son was more than just a name in a newspaper article. He
wasn't just a story, he was a real person. I want people to know
that," she said.
Linda Purnhagen, whose nine- and 16-year-old daughters, were killed
by a father and son in Texas, was outraged by Internet postings
requesting pen pals by both men.
"I love kids and enjoy answering their questions and trying to help
them," wrote the father, Dennis Dowthitt.
Said Purnhagen: "This is a pedophile who committed murder.
They should at least put a disclaimer up there that he
murders children."
Dennis Dowthitt was executed in March. But his son, Delton, who
testified against his father in exchange for a 45-year prison
sentence, is still looking for friends: "At 16, I was convicted of
murder, please don't define me by this fact alone. I'm a work in
progress," he writes.
Many prisoners' websites are run by foreign activists who live in
countries where capital punishment is illegal. The American
Civil Liberties Union, which cites a national error rate of 68 percent
in
death penalty judgments, also hosts some convicts' sites.
"In a matter of life and death, we are getting it wrong more than 2
out of every 3 times," the group's website states.
But the ACLU also championed the cause of Dennis Dowthitt, who
maintained his innocence for 11 years, before making an emotional
confession in the death chamber.
The Canadian Coalition Against the Death Penalty manages Web
pages and pen pal requests for over 1,000 condemned prisoners.
Although she gets complaints from victims' families, coalition
co-founder Tracy Lamourie says she is convinced she is doing the
right thing.
Marc Klaas has repeatedly asked the coalition to dismantle a page
for Richard Allen Davis, who kidnapped and killed his
12-year-old daughter, Polly.
"This guy killed my daughter," Klaas said. "And there he is,
smiling and asking for pen pals on this website. I'd hack the (website
of the) son of a bitch if I could."
Lamourie admitted that the situation was "delicate" but
refused to change her position.
"All we can say is that as soon as there's no death penalty, we'll
take the pages down," Lamourie said. "We feel that as long as
you're killing people, we need to give them a voice."
She said her mailbox is overflowing with requests from prisoners who
want a voice online. They send her hand-scrawled notes, wistful
poems and smiling snapshots to bolster their claim: they aren't
savage animals but innocent Americans accused of crimes they
didn't commit. Lamourie scans the data in her spare time and says
she doesn't make judgment calls about whether the inmates are
telling the truth.
Many of the prisoners she supports have been locked up for
decades and have no idea what this thing called "The Internet" is,
she says. (Few, if any, prisoners have Net access).
Other inmates seem a bit too tech-savvy. Michael Toney,
convicted of rigging a briefcase bomb that killed three people,
tried to auction off seats to his execution online.
But the cries of most death row inmates will be ignored, and their
Internet sites converted into memorials when they are
executed. For some, such as Carl Johnson, their last words will ring
out on the Internet long after they are gone:
"I want the world to know that I'm innocent and that I've found peace. Let's ride."
El pabellón de los condenados a muerte está lleno de
los que dicen ser inocentes y el mundo está lleno de
gente que desprecia la pena de muerte. Todos ellos
encontraron un común denominador online. Por Julia
Scheeres.
Titulares de hoy
15 de junio, 2001
No quieren morir. Y ruegan que los
salvemos.
Cientos de presidiarios que
aguardan la muerte recurrieron a
Internet en un intento de salvar
sus vidas.
Dicen que son inocentes y suplican
que la comunidad de la Red done
dinero para su defensa legal,
envían peticiones a las autoridades
a través del correo electrónico y
leen sus versiones de los hechos.
A través de sitios creados por sus
parientes, amigos y activistas -
muchos de los cuales no residen en
Estados Unidos - tienen la
posibilidad de apelar a una
audiencia mundial en forma directa.
"¡Es un grito de socorro para que
me tiendan una mano! Soy
indigente y no tengo la posibilidad
de conseguir la ayuda legal que
tan desesperadamente necesito, lo
que me puede costar la vida...
Ustedes son mi última esperanza,
¡sin ustedes estoy luchando por
una causa perdida!"
Esas son las palabras de John
Dewberry, un muchacho de 24
años, condenado por asesinar a un
hombre el día de Navidad, en 1994,
y repartir los bienes de la víctima
entre sus amigos como obsequio
navideño.
Pero así como los condenados que
aguardan la muerte recurren a
Internet para pedir clemencia, los
familiares de las víctimas de
homicidio ingresan a la Red para
exigir justicia. Ambas partes
exponen su caso, piden dinero, y
juntan firmas. Algunos buscan
claves para resolver homicidios que
se cometieron hace 30 años.
No sorprende entonces que con
frecuencia haya un choque entre
las dos partes.
Aquí va otro:
"Espero en el pabellón de los
condenados a muerte para que me
ejecuten por un crimen horrible que
no cometí y, a menos que logre
que se preste atención a mi caso,
el estado de Texas me va a
asesinar", escribe Anthony Graves,
hallado culpable junto a otro
hombre de matar a seis personas y
quemar sus cuerpos.
Graves publica su versión de los
hechos en su sitio de Internet,
como también la declaración del
otro implicado en el homicidio,
quien manifiesta que Graves no
participó en el crimen.
Su historia fue suficiente para que
el abogado Roy E. Greenwood se
sintiera comprometido a
defenderlo, sin cobrarle nada por
sus servicios.
"Creo que es inocente", dijo
Greenwood, quien dice haber
gastado 30.000 dólares de su
bolsillo en el caso. "Tiene muchas
posibilidades de que se invalide el
veredicto."
Después está el caso de Gary
Graham. Cuando Graham tenía 17
años, fue condenado por matar a
tiros a un hombre en una playa de
estacionamiento de Houston
Safeway. A pesar del difundido
reclamo de que se anulara el
veredicto, fue ejecutado el año
pasado después de pasar casi 20
años esperando la muerte.
Graham proclamaba a viva voz su
inocencia hasta el momento en que
recibió una inyección letal similar a
la que mató a Timothy McVeigh el
lunes. Sus últimas palabras quedan
como un recordatorio
estremecedor en la Red:
"Esta noche me van a matar. Esta
noche me van a asesinar."
(McVeigh, casualmente, no tenía
un sitio de Internet "oficial", y
nunca proclamó su inocencia. Los
dominios "timothymcveigh.com" y
"timothymcveigh.net" son
propiedad de una tercera parte
que está tratando de vender los
derechos a la dirección de
Internet.)
En Pro-Death Penalty.com (que
significa "a favor de la pena de
muerte") se refutan punto por
punto las afirmaciones de Graham.
El sitio es uno de los tres que
dirige la defensora de las víctimas
Charlene Hall. Los otros dos son
Justice For All (Justicia para todos)
y MurderVictims.com (Víctimas de
homicidios), donde Hall erigió un
monumento virtual a más de 1.800
víctimas de asesinatos.
Comenzó con su labor en la Red
después de que un par de
muchachas adolescentes fueron
violadas y estranguladas en su
ciudad natal por una pandilla de
cinco chicos; una de ellas era la
hija de un amigo cercano. Pero
cuando buscó información en
Internet sobre la pena de muerte,
todo lo que encontró fueron sitios
que estaban en contra de la pena
de muerte. Por lo tanto aprendió
HTML y publicó en la Red
información a favor de la pena
capital.
Hall manifiesta que no tiene
paciencia para escuchar los ruegos
de asesinos convictos.
"Su único propósito es dilatar (la
ejecución)", señala Hall. "En
esencia lo que quieren es comprar
tiempo. Sólo siento pena por las
personas que se dejan engañar;
ojalá se pusieran a averiguar un
poco antes de sentirse tan mal por
esta gente."
Hall se ganó una buena cuota de
odio por email debido a sus puntos
de vista; almacena las amenazas
de muerte e insultos en una
carpeta con el nombre
"Trastornados y no víctimas".
Murdervictims.com sirve como
centro de reunión de integrantes
de familias destrozadas que
lograron sobrevivir: gente que a
menudo es eludida por una
sociedad que prefiere la chanza a
la honestidad.
Sharon Meissner, cuyo hijo de 18
años fue colgado por un conocido,
es uno de los que envía mensajes
con frecuencia al panel de
discusión del sitio. Allí cuenta
sobre la fatídica mañana en que
encontró el cuerpo de Gregg, y
lamenta que su asesino sólo haya
sido condenado por asesinato en
tercer grado y sentenciado a 25
años en la cárcel.
"A veces sentimos que no
encajamos en ningún lado", dijo
Meissner, de Holly, Minnesota. "La
gente quiere que nos olvidemos de
la muerte de nuestro hijo, que
sigamos adelante. En el panel,
podemos hablar sin ofender a
nadie."
Meissner también consiguió ayuda
con sus mensajes. Su caso llamó la
atención de un experto en perfiles
de asesinos que trabaja en
Internet, quien se ofreció a
investigar el caso que, según ella,
fue mal manejado por la policía del
distrito.
En un tributo a su hijo, Meissner
describe la personalidad pícara de
su hijo y se escuchan los acordes
inquietantes de una de sus
canciones favoritas: "Fade to
black" de Metallica.
"Mi hijo fue más que un nombre en
una nota periodística. No fue sólo
una historia, fue una persona real.
Quiero que todos sepan eso",
señala.
Linda Purnhagen, cuyas hijas de 9
y 16 años fueron asesinadas por
un hombre y su hijo en Texas,
estaba indignada por los mensajes
que los dos hombres publicaron en
la Red solicitando amigos para
intercambiar correo.
"Me encantan los niños y disfruto
contestando sus preguntas y
tratando de ayudarlos", escribió el
padre, Dennis Dowthitt.
Purnhagen manifestó: "Es un
pedófilo que cometió un asesinato.
Al menos deberían poner un
descargo allí que diga que asesina
niños."
Dennis Dowthitt fue ejecutado en
marzo. Pero su hijo, Delton, quien
atestiguó en contra de su padre a
cambio de una sentencia de 45
años de prisión, aún está en la
búsqueda de amigos: "A los 16 fui
condenado por un asesinato, por
favor no me encasillen por eso
sólo. Soy una persona en proceso
de construirse", escribe.
Muchos sitios de Internet
dedicados a convictos son
operados por activistas extranjeros
que viven en países donde no
existe la pena de muerte. La Unión
por las Libertades Civiles de
Estados Unidos, que denuncia la
existencia de una tasa de error del
68 por ciento en los casos con
condenas a pena de muerte,
también opera algunos sitios para
convictos.
"Cuando es cuestión de vida o
muerte, nos equivocamos en más
de dos casos de cada tres", señala
el sitio de Internet del grupo.
Pero la asociación también
defendió la causa de Dennis
Dowthitt, quien durante 11 años
sostuvo que era inocente, hasta
que finalmente confesó su
culpabilidad en la cámara de
muerte.
La Coalición Canadiense contra la
Pena de Muerte maneja páginas de
Internet y solicitudes de amigos
por correspondencia de más de
1.000 prisioneros convictos. A
pesar de que recibe quejas de los
familiares de las víctimas, una
cofundadora de la coalición, Tracy
Lamourie, afirma que está
convencida de que está haciendo
lo correcto.
Marc Klaas en varias opotunidades
solicitó a la coalición que dejara
fuera de servicio la página
dedicada a Richard Allen Davis,
quien secuestró y mató a Polly, la
hija de Klaas de 12 años de edad.
"Este tipo mató a mi hija", expresó
Klaas. "Y allí está, sonriendo y
queriendo intercambiar cartas en
su sitio. "Yo haría trizas el (sitio
del) hijo de perra si pudiera."
Lamourie admitió que la situación
era "delicada" pero se niega a
cambiar de posición.
"Todo lo que podemos decir es que
apenas se derogue la pena de
muerte sacaremos todas las
páginas", señaló Lamourie.
"Sentimos que mientras se esté
matando gente, necesitamos
facilitarles una voz."
Lamourie comentó que su casilla de
correo está abarrotada de
solicitudes de presos que quieren
tener voz online. Ella publicó las
notas manuscritas, los poemas
melancólicos y las instantáneas
sonrientes para dar fuerza a sus
reclamos: no son animales salvajes
sino norteamericanos inocentes
que están acusados de crímenes
que no cometieron. Lamourie
escanea los datos en su tiempo
libre y dice que no invita a hacer
juicios de valor acerca de si los
condenados están diciendo la
verdad.
Muchos de los prisioneros a los que
apoya estuvieron encerrados por
décadas y no tienen idea de lo que
significa eso que se llama
"Internet", explica. (Muy pocos
tienen acceso a la Red, si es que
alguno lo tiene).
Otros reclusos parecen un tanto
demasiado expertos en tecnología.
Michael Toney, condenado por
armar una bomba en un maletín
que mató a tres personas, intentó
subastar asientos para presenciar
su ejecución online.
Pero el clamor de la mayoría de los
reos que aguardan la pena de
muerte será pasado por alto, y sus
sitios de Internet se convertirán en
monumentos conmemorativos
después de su ejecución. Para
algunos, como Carl Johnson, sus
últimas palabras seguir&aac